Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Einwilligung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Afkinich, J. L., & Blachman-Demner, D. R. (2020). Providing Incentives to Youth Participants in Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619892707

Akbaba, Y., & Wagner, C. (2021). Zur Reproduktion von Rassismus forschen: Über widersprüchliche ethische Ansprüche, Positionierungen und Loyalitäten. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 243–254). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Certification of Compliance With APA Ethical Principles. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/ethics.pdf

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., & Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment (pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_7

Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (pp. 44–75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107590205

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Beninger, K. (2017). Social media users’ views on the ethics of social media research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods (p. pp 57-73). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Benner, A., & Löhe, J. (2021). Forschungsethische und datenschutzrechtliche Aspekte der informierten Einwilligung als Audioaufnahme. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 205–216). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Biggs, J. S., & Marchesi, A. (2015). Information for consent: Too long and too hard to read. Research Ethics, 11(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115583381

Bober, M. (2004). Virtual Youth Research: An Exploration of Methodologies and Ethical Dilemmas from a British Perspective (p. 29). London School of Economics and Political Science. www.igi-global.com/chapter/virtual-youth-research/28305

Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Testethik. In J. Bortz & N. Döring (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (p. pp 192-193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7_4

Boyd, D. (2016). Untangling research and practice: What Facebook’s “emotional contagion” study teaches us. Research Ethics, 12(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115583379

Boynton, P. M. (2017). The Research Companion: A Practical Guide for Those in the Social Sciences, Health and Development (P. M. Boynton, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2005.11.007

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Bradfield, O. M. (2021). Waving away waivers: an obligation to contribute to ‘herd knowledge’ for data linkage research? Research Ethics, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211058311

Breuer, J., Al Baghal, T., Sloan, L., Bishop, L., Kondyli, D., & Linardis, A. (2021). Informed consent for linking survey and social media data -Differences between platforms and data types. IASSIST Quarterly, 27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/iq988

Buchanan, E. A., & Zimmer, M. (2021, January). Internet research ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/

Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Cato, K. D., Bockting, W., & Larson, E. (2016). Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616661611

Chatfield, K., & Dove, E. (2023). Clarifying our policy on requiring ethics approval in submitted manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(2), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231161402

Chiauzzi, E., & Wicks, P. (2019). Digital Trespass: Ethical and Terms-of-Use Violations by Researchers Accessing Data From an Online Patient Community. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e11985. https://doi.org/10.2196/11985

Chua, S. M. (2021). Navigating conflict between research ethics and online platform terms and conditions: a reflective account. Research Ethics, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211045526

Clark, L. (2017). Ethics of Working with Vulnerable Populations. In C. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–2). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0087

Colnerud, G. (2013). Brief report: ethical problems in research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.37

Colnerud, G. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in research in relation to ethical review: An empirical study. Research Ethics, 10(4), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016114552339

Connors, E. C., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2019). How Transparency Affects Survey Responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(Suppl. 1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz013

Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights - the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.678

Cooper, J. A., & McNair, L. (2018). Practical Ethicist: What Is “Understandable” Language? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 368–370.

Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539

Corti, L., & Bishop, L. (2019). Ethical Issues in Data Sharing and Archiving. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_17-1

Curran, D., Kekewich, M., & Foreman, T. (2019). Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016118798877

Curran, W. J., & Beecher, H. K. (1969). Experimentation in children: a re-examination of legal ethical principles. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 4–10). Ashgate.

Custers, B. (2016). Click here to consent forever: Expiry dates for informed consent. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715624935

Custers, B., Van der Hof, S., & Schermer, B. (2014). Privacy Expectations of Social Media Users: The Role of Informed Consent in Privacy Policies: Privacy Expectations of Social Media Users. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI366

Cutcliffe, J. R., & Ramcharan, P. (2002). Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-as-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 12(7), 1000–1010.

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Dalton-Brown, S. (2021). Personalising the dilemma: research ethics in fiction. 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211066445

De Oliveira, L. L. H., Vissoci, J. R. N., Machado, W. de L., Rodrigues, C. G., & Limkakeng, A. T. (2017). Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617737163

Dittmer, C., & Lorenz, D. F. (2018). Forschen im Kontext von Vulnerabilität und extremem Leid – Ethische Fragen der sozialwissenschaftlichen Katastrophenforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3116

Dobrick, F. M., Fischer, J., & Hagen, L. M. (Eds.). (2018). Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Ethics for the Social Sciences and Humanities in Times of Mediatization and Digitization (1st ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658129088

Dodd, S.-J. (2009). LGBTQ: Protecting Vulnerable Subjects in All Studies. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. 474). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n30

Dreyer, S., & Schulz, W. (2018). Was bringt die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung für automatisierte Entscheidungssysteme? https://doi.org/10.11586/2018011

DuBois, J. (2006). Ethics in behavioral and social science research. In A. Smith Iltis (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 102–120). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203799277-12/ethics-behavioral-social-science-research-james-dubois

Dugosh, K. L., Festinger, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., & Clements, N. T. (2014). Developing an index to measure the voluntariness of consent to research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(4), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614544100

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Eble, M., Ziegele, M., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Forschung in geschlossenen Plattformen des Social Web. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 123–149). Herbert von Halem.

Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320510186

Elgesem, D. (2016). Consent and information – ethical considerations when conducting research on social media. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 14–34). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Elovici, Y., Fire, M., Herzberg, A., & Shulman, H. (2014). Ethical Considerations when Employing Fake Identities in Online Social Networks for Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9473-0

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Ess, C. M. (2019). Internet Research Ethics and Social Media. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_12-1

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2011). European textbook on ethics in research. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/12567a07-6beb-4998-95cd-8bca103fcf43/language-en

Eyal, N. (2014). Using informed consent to save trust. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(7), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100490

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483

Forsyth, D. R., & Pope, W. R. (1984). Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1365

Friedman, M. S., Chiu, C. J., Croft, C., Guadamuz, T. E., Stall, R., & Marshal, M. P. (2016). Ethics of Online Assent: Comparing Strategies to Ensure Informed Assent Among Youth. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615624809

Friedrichs, J. (2019). Forschungsethik. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp. 67–76). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_4

Fuchs, M., Heinemann, T., Heinrichs, B., Hübner, D., Kipper, J., Rottländer, K., Runkel, T., Spranger, T. M., Vermeulen, V., & Völker-Albert, M. (2010). Forschungsethik: eine Einführung. Verlag J. B. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476022493#aboutAuthors

Geier, C., Adams, R. B., Mitchell, K. M., & Holtz, B. E. (2021). Informed Consent for Online Research—Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15562646211020160. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211020160

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Ghandour, L., Yasmine, R., & El-Kak, F. (2013). Giving Consent without Getting Informed: A Cross-Cultural Issue in Research Ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(3), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.12

Ginnis, S. (2017). Where Next for #Socialethics? In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 209–236). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002009

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Golla, S., & Bäcker, M. (2020). Handreichung Datenschutz (2. vollst. überarb. Aufl.) (p. 40). RatSWD. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.50

Good, A. (2020). Disability Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-19). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1

Gorup, M. (2019). Ethics of Observational Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_20-1

Graf von Kielmansegg, S. (2017). Forschungslegitimation durch Einwilligung: Zwischen Autonomie und staatlicher Regulierung. Forschung, 3+4, 95–100.

Höblich, D. (2021). LSBT*IQ-Kinder und -Jugendliche zwischen Agency und Vulnerablität – Forschungsethische Herausforderungen. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 131–155). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Hagen, S., Bishop, E. L., Koščík, M., Vavra, M., Štebe, J., Ryan, L., Payne, E., Løvlie, A. G., Rød, L.-M., Straume, Ø., & Myhren, M. H. (2019). Report on legal and ethical framework and strategies related to access, use, re-use, dissemination and preservation of social media data (6.3; p. 47). SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research. https://seriss.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/D6.3-Report-on-legal-and-ethical-framework-and-strategies...__FINAL.pdf

Harris, J., & Porcellato, L. (2018). Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618766953

Heise, N. (2015). Big Data – small problems? Ethische Dimensionen der Forschung mit Online-Kommunikationsspuren. In Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (p. pp 39-58). ifpuk - Institute for Media and Communication Studies at FU Berlin. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44045

Heise, N., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Ethik der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung. Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 519–539). von Halem.

Helfferich, C. (Ed.). (2011). Forschungsethik, Datenschutzbestimmungen und Einwilligungserklärung. In Die Qualität qualitativer Daten Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews (pp. 190–192). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92076-4_6

Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2011). The Ethics of Social Research. In The Practice of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 59–86). Sage. https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/34088_Chapter4.pdf

Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510

Iphofen, R. (2020). Key Topics in Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_53-1

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Isaak, J., & Hanna, M. J. (2018). User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection. Computer, 51(8), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3191268

Israel, M. (2019). Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists: Beyond Regulatory Compliance (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910096

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2008). Informed Consent. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 432–432). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909

Jackson, J. L., & Larson, E. (2016). Prevalence and commonalities of informed consent templates for biomedical research. Research Ethics, 12(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649995

Jouhki, J., Lauk, E., Penttinen, M., Sormanen, N., & Uskali, T. (2016). Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics. Media and Communication, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.579

Kaewkungwal, J., & Adams, P. (2019). Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand. Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Office of Research Services, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 26(3), 176–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1608190

Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., & Melham, K. (2015). Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.71

Keith, P. K., & Fairfield, J. A. T. (2017). Ethics of Empirical Research. In J. Matthes, R. F. Potter, & C. S. Davis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (p. pp 1-17). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0086

Kirtley, O. J. (2022). Ethical Issues in Experience Sampling Method research. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Eds.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies (pp. 91–100). Independently published.

Koepsell, D., Brinkman, W. P., & Pont, S. (2014). Human research ethics committees in technical universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540596

Kreuter, F., & Peng, R. D. (2014). Extracting Information from Big Data: Issues of Measurement, Inference and Linkage. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 257-275). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.016

Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf

Lauber-Rönsberg, A. (2018). Data Protection Laws, Research Ethics and Social Sciences. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 29–44). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_4

Leavy, P. (2017). Ethics in Social Research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches (pp. 34–55). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276

Legewie, N., & Nassauer, A. (2018). YouTube, Google, Facebook: 21st Century Online Video Research and Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3130

Lewis, J. (2019). Experimental Design. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_19-1

Liang, H., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2017). Big Data, Collection of (Social Media, Harvesting). In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0015

Lindegren, D., Karegar, F., Kane, B., & Pettersson, J. S. (2021). An evaluation of three designs to engage users when providing their consent on smartphones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1697898

Losch, M. E. (2008). Informed Consent. In P. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (Vol. 1, pp. 335–337). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n223

Mühlichen, A. (2019). Informationelle Selbstbestimmung. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (2nd ed., pp. 77–88). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_5

Macnish, K. (2019). Privacy in Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_9-1

Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2015). Measuring voluntariness of consent to research: an instrument review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615571552

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data (pp. 201–209). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-017

McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The Ethics of Internet Research: A Rhetorical, Casebased Process. Peter Lang. DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.003

McKee, H., & Porter, J. E. (2008). The Ethics of Digital Writing Research: A Rhetorical Approach. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 711–749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457031

Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211

Miser, W. F. (2005). Educational research--to IRB, or not to IRB? Family Medicine, 37(3), 168–173.

Narimani, P. (2014). Zustimmung als Prozess: Informiertes Einverständnis in der Praxisforschung mit von Ausweisung bedrohten Drogenabhängigen. In R. M´Bayo (Ed.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 41-58). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_3

Nelson, L. R., Stupiansky, N. W., & Ott, M. A. (2016). The Influence of Age, Health Literacy, and Affluence on Adolescents’ Capacity to Consent to Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616636232

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Norval, C., & Henderson, T. (2020). Automating Dynamic Consent Decisions for the Processing of Social Media Data in Health Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619883715

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide To Research Ethics (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Pentzold, C. (2015). Forschungsethische Prämissen und Problemfelder teilnehmenden Beobachtens auf Online-Plattformen. In A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken (Eds.), Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 61–85). https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.0

Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2018). Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617738846

Perrault, E. K., & McCullock, S. P. (2019). Concise Consent Forms Appreciated—Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853453

Perrault, E. K., & Nazione, S. A. (2016). Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616654610

Pflüger, A., & Dobel, H. (2014). Datenschutz in der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 485–518). Herbert von Halem Verlag.

Phelan, S. K., & Kinsella, E. A. (2013). Picture This . . . Safety, Dignity, and Voice—Ethical Research With Children: Practical Considerations for the Reflexive Researcher. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412462987

Pickles, J. (2017). Contamination of overt data with covert data. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117721281

Plutzer, E. (2019). Privacy, Sensitive Questions, and Informed Consent. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(Suppl. 1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz017

Prictor, M., Lewis, M. A., Newson, A. J., Haas, M., Baba, S., Kim, H., Kokado, M., Minari, J., Molnár-Gábor, F., Yamamoto, B., Kaye, J., & Teare, H. J. A. (2019). Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619887073

Prinzing, M., Schlütz, D., Kaufmann, K., Kreissl, J., & Rakebrand, T. (2020). Ethikkompetenz als Querschnittsaufgabe. Publizistik, 65, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-020-00578-4

Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2017). The ethics of researching unlikeable subjects. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2/3), 251–269. Communication & Mass Media Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=123562776&site=ehost-live

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (Ed.). (2017). Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.1

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD). (2020). Datenerhebung mit neuer Informationstechnologie. Empfehlungen zu Datenqualität und -management, Forschungsethik und Datenschutz (6 (6); RatSWD Output 6 (6)). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.47

Rau, J., Münch, F., & Asli, M. (2021). SOCRATES: Social Media Research Assessment Template for Ethical Scholarship. 24.

Recuber, T. (2015). From obedience to contagion: Discourses of power in Milgram, Zimbardo, and the Facebook experiment. Research Ethics, 12(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115579533

Redline, C., & Tuttle, A. D. (2022). In an Era of Enhanced Cybersecurity: The Effect of Disclosing a Third Party’s Role in Confidentiality Pledges on Response Propensity. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smac009

Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A. C., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ, 7(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2

Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

Rintala, A., Apers, S., Eisele, G., & Verhoeven, D. (2022). BRIEFING AND DEBRIEFING IN AN EXPERIENCE SAMPLING STUDY. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Eds.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies (pp. 119–134). Independently published.

Roache, R. (2014). Why is informed consent important? J Med Ethics, 40(7), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102264

Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005

Rothstein, M. A. (2015). Ethical Issues in Big Data Health Research: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(2), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12258

Salmons, J. (2017). Getting to Yes: Informed Consent in Qualitative Social Media Research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 109–134). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002005

Samuel, G., & Buchanan, E. (2020). Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619901215

Schaar, K. (2016). Was hat die Wissenschaft beim Datenschutz künftig zu beachten? Allgemeine und spezifische Änderungen beim Datenschutz im Wissenschaftsbereich durch die neue Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung. RatSWD Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.19

Schaar, K. (2017). Die informierte Einwilligung als Voraussetzung für die (Nach-)nutzung von Forschungsdaten. RatSWD Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.12

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2013). Standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft: Einführung und forschungsethische Grundlagen. In D. Schlütz & W. Möhring (Eds.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (p. pp 9-19). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1_1

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2016-4-483

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Schmidt, J.-H. (2009). Braucht das Web 2.0 eine eigene Forschungsethik? Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie und Medienethik, 11 (2), 40–44. https://www.hans-bredow-institut.de/en/publications/does-the-web-2-0-need-its-own-research-ethics

Sherwood, G., & Parsons, S. (2021). Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people: learning from social science researchers. 17(4), 448–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211014941

Sidze, S. M., Köhler, T., & Szarzynski, J. (2018). Ethical Issues in Collecting Data from Informant of the Field. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 101-104). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_9

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Singer, E. (1984). Public Reactions to Some Ethical Issues of Social Research: Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 501–509. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1086/208986

Sloan, L., Jessop, C., Al Baghal, T., & Williams, M. (2019). Linking Survey and Twitter Data: Informed Consent, Disclosure, Security, and Archiving. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853447

Sponholz, G. (Ed.). (2019). Curriculum für Lehrveranstaltungen zur guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis - Erweiterte und überarbeitete Fassung. https://ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-Curriculum-f%C3%BCr-Lehrveranstaltungen-zur-GWP.pdf

Steinhardt, I., Fischer, C., Heimstädt, M., Hirsbrunner, S. D., İkiz-Akıncı, D., Kressin, L., Kretzer, S., Möllenkamp, A., Porzelt, M., Rahal, R.-M., Schimmler, S., Wilke, R., & Wünsche, H. (2020). Das Öffnen und Teilen von Daten qualitativer Forschung: eine Handreichung (Weizenbaum Series, 6, p. S. 31). Berlin: Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society - The German Internet Institute. https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.ws/6

Stern, S. (2004). Studying Adolescents Online: A Consideration of Ethical Issues. In E. Buchnan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274–287). Idea Group.

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Sutrop, M., & Louk, K. (2020). Informed Consent and Ethical Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_8-1

Swirsky, E. S., Hoop, J. G., & Labott, S. (2014). Using Social Media in Research: New Ethics for a New Meme? American Journal of Bioethics, 14(10), 60–61. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.948302

Szala-Meneok, K. (2009). Ethical Research With Older Adults. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 507–518). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n32

Tännsjö, T. (2014). Utilitarianism and informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(7), 445. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101206

Taplin, S., Chalmers, J., Brown, J., Moore, T., Graham, A., & McArthur, M. (2022). How do Research Ethics Committee Members Respond to Hypothetical Studies with Children? Results from the MESSI Study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221087530

Tarboush, N. A., Alkayed, Z., Alzoubi, K. H., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2020). The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(121). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02040-5

Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559

Theiss, J. D., Hobbs, W. B., Giordano, P. J., & Brunson, O. M. (2014). Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540593

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. The University of Aberdeen. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2017). The Ethics of Using Social Media Data in Research: A New Framework. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 189–208). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002008

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report

Van Baalen, S. (2018). ‘Google wants to know your location’: The ethical challenges of fieldwork in the digital age. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750312

Van Schie, G., Westra, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2017). Get Your Hands Dirty: Emerging Data Practices as Challenge for Research Integrity. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society Studying Culture through Data (pp. 183–200). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-016

Vargas, L. A., & Montoya, M. E. (2009). Involving Minors in Research: Ethics and Law Within Multicultural Settings. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 489–506). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n31

Venema, R., Pfurtscheller, D., & Lobinger, K. (2020). Doing Visual Analysis Online. Forschungsethische Herausforderungen und Handlungsempfehlungen zur Analyse vernetzter Bilder. In C. Brantner, G. Götzenbrucker, K. Lobinger, & M. Schreiber (Eds.), Vernetzte Bilder: Visuelle Kommunikation in Sozialen Medien (pp. 288–310). von Halem.

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der Methodenlehre: Erfahrungen aus einem Soziologie-Seminar. In R. M´Bayo (Ed.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 209-231). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_12

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Grundsätze, Debatten und offene Fragen. In R. M´Bayo, P. Narimani, & H. Von Unger (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 15-39). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_2

Von Unger, H. (2018). Forschungsethik, digitale Archivierung und biographische Interviews. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 681–693). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18171-0_57

Von Unger, H., & Narimani, P. (2012). Ethische Reflexivität im Forschungsprozess: Herausforderungen in der Partizipativen Forschung. WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2012-304, Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70197

Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719

Von Unger, H., Narimani, P., & M´Bayo, R. (Eds.). (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Reflexivität, Perspektiven, Positionen (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9

Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2019). Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 424–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619862395

Wagner, G. G. (2017). Anmerkungen zu den vielfältigen Dimensionen einer Forschungsethik in den Sozial-, Verhaltens- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 265). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.10

Walzenbach, S., Burton, J., Couper, M. P., Crossley, T. F., & JÄckle, A. (2023). Experiments on Multiple Requests for Consent to Data Linkage in Surveys. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 11(3), 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab053

Wassenaar, D., & Mamotte, N. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsey, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268–282). Oxford University Press.

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Wilbanks, J. (2014). Portable Approaches to Informed Consent and Open Data. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 234-252). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.014

Wiles, R., Crow, G., Charles, V., & Heath, S. (2007). Informed Consent and the Research Process: Following Rules or Striking Balances? Sociological Research Online, 12(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1208

Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310378979

Willis, R. (2019). Observations online: Finding the ethical boundaries of Facebook research. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117740176

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick (Eds.), Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (pp. 64–87). Wadsworth Cengage.

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Zeni, J. (2009). Ethics and the ‘Personal’ in Action Research. In B. Somekh & S. E. Noffke (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 254–265). Sage.

Zimmer, M. (2018). Addressing Conceptual Gaps in Big Data Research Ethics: An Application of Contextual Integrity. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 205630511876830. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768300

Zwitter, A. (2014). Big Data ethics. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714559253

Einwilligung

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende