Vulnerable Zielgruppen Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.
Afkinich, J. L., & Blachman-Demner, D. R. (2020). Providing Incentives to Youth Participants in Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619892707 Akbaba, Y., & Wagner, C. (2021). Zur Reproduktion von Rassismus forschen: Über widersprüchliche ethische Ansprüche, Positionierungen und Loyalitäten. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 243–254). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16 Angell, E. L., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2008). Style Matters: An Analysis of 100 Research Ethics Committee Decision Letters. Research Ethics, 4(3), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610800400304 Barnes, C. (2009). An Ethical Agenda in Disability Research: Rhetoric or Reality? In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 458–473). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n29 Baumrind, D. (1964). Psychology in action: some thoughts on the ethics of research: after reading Milgram’s Behavioral Study of Obedience. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 349–351). Ashgate. Biddle, L., Cooper, J., Owen-Smith, A., Klineberg, E., Bennewith, O., Hawton, K., Kapur, N., Donovan, J., & Gunnell, D. (2013). Qualitative interviewing with vulnerable populations: individuals’ experiences of participating in suicide and self-harm based research. Journal of Affective Disorders, 145(3), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.024 Bilke, N. (2010). Kriegsberichterstattung. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 442-453). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_30 Bluvstein, I., Ifrah, K., Lifshitz, R., Markovitz, N., & Shmotkin, D. (2021). Vulnerability and Resilience in Sensitive Research: The Case of the Quantitative Researcher. 16(4), 396–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211027418 Bohrmann, T. (2010). Mediale Gewaltdarstellungen. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 417-423). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_27 Boynton, P. M. (2017). The Research Companion: A Practical Guide for Those in the Social Sciences, Health and Development (P. M. Boynton, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2005.11.007 Brotsky, S. R., & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “pro-ana” community: a covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701190600 Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404 Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19, 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043 Cato, K. D., Bockting, W., & Larson, E. (2016). Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616661611 Clark, L. (2017). Ethics of Working with Vulnerable Populations. In C. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–2). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0087 Clark, L. (2017). Interviewing Vulnerable Populations. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0126 Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights - the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.678 Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539 Coughlin, S. S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1992). Ethics, Scientific Validity, and the Design of Epidemiologic Studies. Epidemiology, 3(4), 343–347. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org.emedien.ub.uni-muenchen.de/stable/3702736 Curran, W. J., & Beecher, H. K. (1969). Experimentation in children: a re-examination of legal ethical principles. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 4–10). Ashgate. Cutcliffe, J. R., & Ramcharan, P. (2002). Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-as-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 12(7), 1000–1010. Dittmer, C., & Lorenz, D. F. (2018). Forschen im Kontext von Vulnerabilität und extremem Leid – Ethische Fragen der sozialwissenschaftlichen Katastrophenforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3116 Dodd, S.-J. (2009). LGBTQ: Protecting Vulnerable Subjects in All Studies. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. 474). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n30 DuBois, J. (2006). Ethics in behavioral and social science research. In A. Smith Iltis (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 102–120). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203799277-12/ethics-behavioral-social-science-research-james-dubois Dwork, C. (2014). Differential Privacy: A Cryptographic Approach to Private Data Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 296-322). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.018 Edward, M., & Greenough, C. (2019). Queer Literacy. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_57-1 Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491 European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2011). European textbook on ethics in research. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/12567a07-6beb-4998-95cd-8bca103fcf43/language-en Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Participatory Research: Recommendations for Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7 Frieters-Reermann, N., Klomann, V., Genenger-Stricker, M., & Sylla, N. (2021). „Wir sind nicht dein nächstes Forschungsprojekt!“ – Kritische Reflexionen zu Ethik, Methodik und Machtverhältnissen in Forschungsprozessen im Kontext von Bildung und Migration. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 255–267). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16 Giaxoglou, K. (2017). Reflections on internet research ethics from language-focused research on web-based mourning: revisiting the private/public distinction as a language ideology of differentiation. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2/3), 229–250. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1037 Goerge, L. (2020). The Ethics of Research and Indigenous Peoples. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_31-1 Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082 Good, A. (2020). Disability Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-19). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1 Graumann, S. (2011). Forschungsethik. In M. Düwell, C. Hübenthal, & M. H. Werner (Eds.), Handbuch Ethik (p. pp 252-258). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05192-9_3 Höblich, D. (2021). LSBT*IQ-Kinder und -Jugendliche zwischen Agency und Vulnerablität – Forschungsethische Herausforderungen. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 131–155). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16 Hagen, S., Bishop, E. L., Koščík, M., Vavra, M., Štebe, J., Ryan, L., Payne, E., Løvlie, A. G., Rød, L.-M., Straume, Ø., & Myhren, M. H. (2019). Report on legal and ethical framework and strategies related to access, use, re-use, dissemination and preservation of social media data (6.3; p. 47). SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research. https://seriss.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/D6.3-Report-on-legal-and-ethical-framework-and-strategies...__FINAL.pdf Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7 Jonas, H. (1969). Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (p. pp.11-18). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-4/philosophical-reflections-experimenting-human-subjects-hans-jonas?context=ubx&refId=915ef2d1-ffbb-458a-8294-e915b2643a4d Karr, A. F., & Reiter, J. P. (2014). Using Statistics to Protect Privacy. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 276-295). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.017 Kaufmann, K. (2018). Mit Kriegsflüchtlingen über ihre Smartphone-Nutzung auf der Flucht sprechen: Eine forschungsethische (Selbst-)Reflexion. In M. Prinzing, M. Schröder, & N. Köberer (Eds.), Migration, Integration, Inklusion. Medienethische Potenziale für die digitale Mediengesellschaft (pp. 135–150). Nomos. Kingston, A. K. (2019). Feminist Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_64-1 Klassen, S., & Fiesler, C. (2022). “This Isn’t Your Data, Friend”: Black Twitter as a Case Study on Research Ethics for Public Data. Social Media + Society, 8(4), 205630512211443. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221144317 Koepsell, D., Brinkman, W. P., & Pont, S. (2014). Human research ethics committees in technical universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540596 Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf Lahman, M. K. E. (2017). Ethics in Social Science Research: Becoming Culturally Responsive (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/ethics-in-social-science-research/book249319 Lakeman, R., & FitzGerald, M. (2009). The ethics of suicide research: The views of ethics committee members. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 30(1), 13–19. APA PsycArticles. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13 Machin, H. E., & Shardlow, S. M. (2017). Overcoming ethical barriers to research. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739938 Mahoney, J., Le Louvier, K., Lawson, S., Bertel, D., & Ambrosetti, E. (2022). Ethical considerations in social media analytics in the context of migration: lessons learned from a Horizon 2020 project. Research Ethics, 18(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221087542 Marwick, A. E., Blackwell, L., & Lo, K. (2016). Best Practices for Conducting Risky Research and Protecting Yourself from Online Harassment. Data & Society Research Institute. McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A Delicate Balancing Act: Negotiating with Gatekeepers for Ethical Research When Researching Minority Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102 McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The Ethics of Internet Research: A Rhetorical, Casebased Process. Peter Lang. DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.003 McKee, H., & Porter, J. E. (2008). The Ethics of Digital Writing Research: A Rhetorical Approach. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 711–749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457031 McRae, L., Ellis, K., Kent, M., & Locke, K. (2019). Privacy and the Ethics of Disability Research: Changing Perceptions of Privacy and Smartphone Use. In J. Hunsinger, M. M. Allen, & L. Klastrup (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 1–17). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_66-1 Medley-Rath, S. (2019). Using Facebook Secret Groups for Qualitative Data Collection. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3963 Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971 Murray, T. H. (1980). Learning to deceive. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 367–370). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-36/learning-deceive-thomas-murray Nairn, A., & Clarke, B. (2012). Researching Children: Are We Getting it Right?: A Discussion of Ethics. International Journal of Market Research, 54(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-2-177-198 Nakray, K., Alston, M., & Whittenbury, K. (Eds.). (2015). Social Science Research Ethics for a Globalizing World: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880020 Ntseane, P. G. (2009). The Ethics of the Researcher-Subject Relationship: Experiences From the Field. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 295–307). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n19 O’Mathúna, D. P. (2019). Ethics and Integrity for Research in Disasters and Crises. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_33-1 O’Sullivan, R. (2020). Older Citizens’ Involvement in Aging Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_29-2 Ohm, P. (2014). Changing the Rules: General Principles for Data Use and Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 96-111). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.006 Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide To Research Ethics (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education. Podschuweit, N. (2021). How ethical challenges of covert observations can be met in practice. Research Ethics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211008218 Prinzing, M., Schlütz, D., Kaufmann, K., Kreissl, J., & Rakebrand, T. (2020). Ethikkompetenz als Querschnittsaufgabe. Publizistik, 65, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-020-00578-4 Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A. C., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ, 7(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2 Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8 Roffee, J. A., & Waling, A. (2017). Resolving ethical challenges when researching with minority and vulnerable populations: LGBTIQ victims of violence, harassment and bullying. Research Ethics, 13(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116658693 Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005 Salganik, M. J. (2017). Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age (Open review edition). Princeton University Press. https://www.bitbybitbook.com/en/introduction/ink-blot/ Schroeder, D. (2019). Benefit Sharing. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_11-1 Sherwood, G., & Parsons, S. (2021). Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people: learning from social science researchers. 17(4), 448–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211014941 Sims, J. (2019). Ethical Research with Hard-to-Reach Groups. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_32-1 Singh, S., & Sagar, R. (2022). Safety and Ethical Concerns Associated with Conducting Online Survey Studies among Children and Adolescents. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 44(2), 199–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211070430 Sponholz, G. (Ed.). (2019). Curriculum für Lehrveranstaltungen zur guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis - Erweiterte und überarbeitete Fassung. https://ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-Curriculum-f%C3%BCr-Lehrveranstaltungen-zur-GWP.pdf Staksrud, E. (2016). Counting children On research methodology, ethics and policy development. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 98–121). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3 Stapf, I. (2010). Tod und Sterben. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 391-405). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_25 Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767 Surmiak, A. D. (2018). Confidentiality in Qualitative Research Involving Vulnerable Participants: Researchers’ Perspectives. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research; Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research, 19(3/12). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099 Szala-Meneok, K. (2009). Ethical Research With Older Adults. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 507–518). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n32 Tiidenberg, K. (2018). Research Ethics, Vulnerability, and Trust on the Internet. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, & M. M. Allen (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 1–15). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_55-1 Van liempt, I., & Bilger, V. (2012). Ethical challenges in research with vulnerable migrants. In C. Vargas-Silva & E. Elgar (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Migration (pp. 451–466). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005231.00031 Vargas, L. A., & Montoya, M. E. (2009). Involving Minors in Research: Ethics and Law Within Multicultural Settings. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 489–506). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n31 Von Unger, H., & Narimani, P. (2012). Ethische Reflexivität im Forschungsprozess: Herausforderungen in der Partizipativen Forschung. WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2012-304, Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70197 Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719 Von Unger, H., Narimani, P., & M´Bayo, R. (Eds.). (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Reflexivität, Perspektiven, Positionen (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9 Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2019). Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 424–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619862395 Watteler, O., & Ebel, T. (2019). Datenschutz im Forschungsdatenmanagement. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 57–80). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233 Wiles, R., Crow, G., Charles, V., & Heath, S. (2007). Informed Consent and the Research Process: Following Rules or Striking Balances? Sociological Research Online, 12(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1208 Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310378979 Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: with special reference to the Stanford prison experiment. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 353–366). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-35/ethics-intervention-human-psychological-research-special-reference-stanford-prison-experiment-philip-zimbardo?context=ubx&refId=36a7e77e-65dc-45cf-b50a-47a41e9016db