Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Schadensvermeidung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Afkinich, J. L., & Blachman-Demner, D. R. (2020). Providing Incentives to Youth Participants in Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619892707

American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Certification of Compliance With APA Ethical Principles. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/ethics.pdf

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., & Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment (pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_7

Barchard, K. A., & Williams, J. (2008). Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1111–1128. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1111

Barnes, S. B. (2004). Issues of Attribution and Identification in Online Social Research. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 203–222). P. Lang.

Baumrind, D. (1964). Psychology in action: some thoughts on the ethics of research: after reading Milgram’s Behavioral Study of Obedience. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 349–351). Ashgate.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/filmuniversitaet/detail.action?docID=5763592

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Beninger, K. (2017). Social media users’ views on the ethics of social media research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods (p. pp 57-73). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Biddle, L., Cooper, J., Owen-Smith, A., Klineberg, E., Bennewith, O., Hawton, K., Kapur, N., Donovan, J., & Gunnell, D. (2013). Qualitative interviewing with vulnerable populations: individuals’ experiences of participating in suicide and self-harm based research. Journal of Affective Disorders, 145(3), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.024

Bilke, N. (2010). Kriegsberichterstattung. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 442-453). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_30

Blay, A. D., Gooden, E. S., Mellon, M. J., & Stevens, D. E. (2018). The Usefulness of Social Norm Theory in Empirical Business Ethics Research: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3286-4

Bluvstein, I., Ifrah, K., Lifshitz, R., Markovitz, N., & Shmotkin, D. (2021). Vulnerability and Resilience in Sensitive Research: The Case of the Quantitative Researcher. 16(4), 396–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211027418

Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Testethik. In J. Bortz & N. Döring (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (p. pp 192-193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7_4

Boyd, K. M. (2017). Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 55–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001006

Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Cato, K. D., Bockting, W., & Larson, E. (2016). Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616661611

Colnerud, G. (2013). Brief report: ethical problems in research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.37

Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Dittmer, C., & Lorenz, D. F. (2018). Forschen im Kontext von Vulnerabilität und extremem Leid – Ethische Fragen der sozialwissenschaftlichen Katastrophenforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3116

Dodd, S.-J. (2009). LGBTQ: Protecting Vulnerable Subjects in All Studies. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. 474). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n30

Dreyer, S., & Schulz, W. (2018). Was bringt die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung für automatisierte Entscheidungssysteme? https://doi.org/10.11586/2018011

DuBois, J. (2006). Ethics in behavioral and social science research. In A. Smith Iltis (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 102–120). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203799277-12/ethics-behavioral-social-science-research-james-dubois

Dwork, C. (2014). Differential Privacy: A Cryptographic Approach to Private Data Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 296-322). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.018

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2011). European textbook on ethics in research. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/12567a07-6beb-4998-95cd-8bca103fcf43/language-en

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Forsyth, D. R., & Pope, W. R. (1984). Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1365

Fuchs, M., Heinemann, T., Heinrichs, B., Hübner, D., Kipper, J., Rottländer, K., Runkel, T., Spranger, T. M., Vermeulen, V., & Völker-Albert, M. (2010). Forschungsethik: eine Einführung. Verlag J. B. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476022493#aboutAuthors

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Glasziou, P., & Chalmers, I. (2004). Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? BMJ, 328, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Good, A. (2020). Disability Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-19). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1

Gorup, M. (2017). The Respect Project in the Rear-View Mirror: Past, Present and Future of International Professional and Ethics Guidelines for Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 157–176). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001013

Grimm, P., & Krah, H. (2016). Privatsphäre. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 178-185). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_24

Guta, A., & Voronka, J. (2019). Ethical Issues in Community-Based, Participatory, and Action-Oriented Forms of Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_24-1

Halavais, A. (2019). Overcoming terms of service: a proposal for ethical distributed research. Information, Communication & Society, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1627386

Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802170288

Hammersley, M. (2019). Ethics of Ethnography. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_50-1

Heise, N. (2015). Big Data – small problems? Ethische Dimensionen der Forschung mit Online-Kommunikationsspuren. In Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (p. pp 39-58). ifpuk - Institute for Media and Communication Studies at FU Berlin. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44045

Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510

Hopf, C. (2016). Forschungsethik und qualitative Forschung. In W. Hopf & U. Kuckartz (Eds.), Schriften zu Methodologie und Methoden qualitativer Sozialforschung (p. pp 195-205). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11482-4_9

Iphofen, R. (2020). Acting Ethically and with Integrity for Research Subjects and Participants. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_55-1

Israel, M. (2019). Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists: Beyond Regulatory Compliance (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910096

Jandt, S. (2016). Informationelle Selbstbestimmung. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 195-202). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_26

Jennings, S. (2012). Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics, 8(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445423

Köhler, D. (2005). Problemfelder der Internet-Ethik. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch (pp. 219–228). LIT Verlag.

Karr, A. F., & Reiter, J. P. (2014). Using Statistics to Protect Privacy. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 276-295). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.017

Kreuter, F., & Peng, R. D. (2014). Extracting Information from Big Data: Issues of Measurement, Inference and Linkage. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 257-275). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.016

Kvalnes, Ø. (Ed.). (2020). Digital Dilemmas: Exploring Social Media Ethics in Organizations (1. Edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45927-7

Losch, M. E. (2008). Informed Consent. In P. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (Vol. 1, pp. 335–337). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n223

Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

McKee, H., & Porter, J. E. (2008). The Ethics of Digital Writing Research: A Rhetorical Approach. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 711–749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457031

Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971

Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211

Murray, T. H. (1980). Learning to deceive. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 367–370). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-36/learning-deceive-thomas-murray

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

O’Mathúna, D. P. (2019). Ethics and Integrity for Research in Disasters and Crises. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_33-1

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Pickles, J. (2017). Contamination of overt data with covert data. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117721281

Pimple, K. D. (Ed.). (2008). Research Ethics (1st ed.). Ashgate. https://www.routledge.com/Research-Ethics/Pimple/p/book/9780754626213

Podschuweit, N. (2021). How ethical challenges of covert observations can be met in practice. Research Ethics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211008218

Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey. American Psychologist, 47(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.3.397

Rössler, P. (2017). Die Ethik: Der Mensch und das Internet. In P. Rössler (Ed.), Inhaltsanalyse: Vol. 3., völlig überarbeitete Auflage (p. pp 223-233). UVK Verlag. https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/epdf/10.36198/9783838547060-223-234

Rakebrand, T., & Schlütz, D. (2019). Forschungsethik in der kommunikations- und medienwissenschaftlichen Hochschullehre. Erkenntnisse aus der Praxis. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 67(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2019-2-187

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (Ed.). (2017). Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.1

Reiter, H. (2021). Anmerkungen zur Schutzbedürftigkeit qualitativer Sozialforscher*innen im Rahmen einer erweiterten Forschungsethik. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschugnsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit. Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 269–280). Verlag Barbara Budrich.

Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177

Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005

Sacco, D. F., Bruton, S. V., & Brown, M. (2018). In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617743834

Samuel, G., Ahmed, W., Kara, H., Jessop, C., Quinton, S., & Sanger, S. (2018). Is It Time to Re-Evaluate the Ethics Governance of Social Media Research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618793773

Scheliga, K., & Friesike, S. (2014). Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma? First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2016-4-483

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Sleat, M. (2017). Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 37–46). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001004

Speiglman, R., & Spear, P. (2009). The Role of Institutional Review Boards: Ethics: Now You See Them, Now You Don’t. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 121–134). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-handbook-of-social-research-ethics/n8.xml

Staksrud, E. (2016). Counting children On research methodology, ethics and policy development. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 98–121). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Stapf, I. (2010). Tod und Sterben. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 391-405). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_25

Taylor, S. J. (1987). Observing abuse: professional ethics and personal morality in field research. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 371–388). Ashgate. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00988991.pdf

Thomas, J. (2004). Reexamining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the Challenge of Overzealous Oversight. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 187–202). P. Lang.

Tolich, M., Tumilty, E., Choe, L., Hohmann-Marriott, B., & Fahey, N. (2019). Researcher Emotional Safety as Ethics in Practice. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_26-1

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report

Van Baalen, S. (2018). ‘Google wants to know your location’: The ethical challenges of fieldwork in the digital age. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750312

Vargas, L. A., & Montoya, M. E. (2009). Involving Minors in Research: Ethics and Law Within Multicultural Settings. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 489–506). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n31

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der Methodenlehre: Erfahrungen aus einem Soziologie-Seminar. In R. M´Bayo (Ed.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 209-231). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_12

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Grundsätze, Debatten und offene Fragen. In R. M´Bayo, P. Narimani, & H. Von Unger (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 15-39). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_2

Von Unger, H. (2018). Forschungsethik, digitale Archivierung und biographische Interviews. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 681–693). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18171-0_57

Von Unger, H., & Narimani, P. (2012). Ethische Reflexivität im Forschungsprozess: Herausforderungen in der Partizipativen Forschung. WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2012-304, Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70197

Von Unger, H., Narimani, P., & M´Bayo, R. (Eds.). (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Reflexivität, Perspektiven, Positionen (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9

Wagner, G. G. (2017). Anmerkungen zu den vielfältigen Dimensionen einer Forschungsethik in den Sozial-, Verhaltens- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 265). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.10

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Wilbanks, J. (2014). Portable Approaches to Informed Consent and Open Data. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 234-252). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.014

Williamson, V., Murphy, D., Castro, C., Vermetten, E., Jetly, R., & Greenberg, N. (2021). Moral injury and the need to carry out ethically responsible research. Research Ethics, 17(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120969743

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: with special reference to the Stanford prison experiment. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 353–366). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-35/ethics-intervention-human-psychological-research-special-reference-stanford-prison-experiment-philip-zimbardo?context=ubx&refId=36a7e77e-65dc-45cf-b50a-47a41e9016db

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

Zoller, H. M., Fujishiro, K., Mobley, A., & Lehman, E. (2015). Perspectives on Communication and Participation in Research Notification Focus Groups. Health Communication, 30(10), 986–1000. Communication & Mass Media Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=108302816&site=ehost-live

Schadensvermeidung

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende