Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Quantitative Forschung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Bluvstein, I., Ifrah, K., Lifshitz, R., Markovitz, N., & Shmotkin, D. (2021). Vulnerability and Resilience in Sensitive Research: The Case of the Quantitative Researcher. 16(4), 396–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211027418

Connors, E. C., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2019). How Transparency Affects Survey Responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(Suppl. 1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz013

De Oliveira, L. L. H., Vissoci, J. R. N., Machado, W. de L., Rodrigues, C. G., & Limkakeng, A. T. (2017). Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617737163

Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., Lukito, J., Bier, L. M., Zhang, R., Johnson, B. K., Huskey, R., Schneider, F. M., Breuer, J., Parry, D. A., Vermeulen, I., Fisher, J. T., Banks, J., Weber, R., Ellis, D. A., … de Vreese, C. (2020). An Agenda for Open Science in Communication. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052

Dugosh, K. L., Festinger, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., & Clements, N. T. (2014). Developing an index to measure the voluntariness of consent to research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(4), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614544100

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172006

Hartman, T., Kennedy, H., Steedman, R., & Jones, R. (2020). Public perceptions of good data management: Findings from a UK-based survey. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720935616. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720935616

Hessler, G. (2012). Konstellationen von Wissenschaft und Praxis in der empirischen Sozialforschung. In K. Unzicker & G. Hessler (Eds.), Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis (pp. 157–177). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_8

Hofmann, B., & Holm, S. (2019). Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos? Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119880844

Hofmann, R. (2018). Queering quantitative research: dealing with processes of categorization in EDI research. In L. A. E. Booysen, R. Bendl, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Diversity Management, Equality and Inclusion at Work (pp. 372–389). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476084.00026

Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., De Vries, R., & Anderson, M. S. (2010). The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.67

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Perrault, E. K., & McCullock, S. P. (2019). Concise Consent Forms Appreciated—Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853453

Perrault, E. K., & Nazione, S. A. (2016). Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616654610

Petillion, W., Melrose, S., Moore, S. L., & Nuttgens, S. (2017). Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), pp 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677635

Podschuweit, N. (2021). How ethical challenges of covert observations can be met in practice. Research Ethics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211008218

Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey. American Psychologist, 47(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.3.397

Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383696

Raykov, M. (2020). Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119893461

Roehse, E.-M., Möhring, W., Zillich, A. F., Schlütz, D., & Link, E. (2023). Forschungsethische Praxis in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft – ein Einblick in die Sicht der Forschenden. Publizistik, 68(4), 459–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-023-00820-9

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2011). Ethical Principles in Data Analysis: An Overview. In A. T. Panter & S. K. Sterba (Eds.), Handbook of Ethics in Quantitative Methodology (pp. 37–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840023.ch3

Sacco, D. F., Bruton, S. V., & Brown, M. (2018). In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617743834

Szala-Meneok, K. (2009). Ethical Research With Older Adults. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 507–518). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n32

Theiss, J. D., Hobbs, W. B., Giordano, P. J., & Brunson, O. M. (2014). Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540593

Tully, M., Vail, A., Roberts, S., Brabin, L., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 3.: Sampling and Data Analysis. Research Ethics, 5(3), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500313

Vail, A., Tully, M., Brabin, L., Roberts, S., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 2.: Are the Study Aims Justified and is the Design Appropriate? Research Ethics, 5(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500212

Vermeulen, I., & Hartmann, T. (2015). Questionable Research and Publication Practices in Communication Science. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096331

Zillich, A. F., Schlütz, D., Roehse, E.-M., Link, E., & Möhring, W. (2023). Practicing Internet Research Ethics: Challenges and Solutions from a German Perspective. Comunicazioni Sociali, 2, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.26350/001200_000185

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is Quantitative Research Ethical? Tools for Ethically Practicing, Evaluating, and Using Quantitative Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3549-8

Quantitative Forschung

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende