Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Methodenkompetenzen

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Braun, R., Ravn, T., & Frankus, E. (2020). What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity? Research Ethics, 16(1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898402

Hedges, D., & Brown, B. L. (2009). Use and Misuse of Quantitative Methods: Data Collection, Calculation, and Presentation. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 373–387). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n24

Leonelli, S., Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Fleming, L., & Williams, H. (2021). From FAIR data to fair data use: Methodological data fairness in health-related social media research. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211010310. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211010310

Markham, A. (2006). Ethic as Method, Method as Ethic: A Case for Reflexivity in Qualitative ICT Research. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.15.2.37

Netscher, S., & Trixa, J. (2019). Forschungsdatenmanagement in der Sekundäranalyse. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 135–150). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Warfield, K., Hoholuk, J., Vincent, B., & Camargo, A. D. (2019). Pics, Dicks, Tits, and Tats: negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2068–2086. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837715