Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Ethikpruefung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Bleisch, B., Huppenbauer, M., & Baumberger, C. (2021). Ethische Entscheidungsfindung: Ein Handbuch für die Praxis (3., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Nomos Verlag.

Brown, S., Davidovic, J., & Hasan, A. (2021). The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951720983865. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720983865

Carniel, J., Hickey, A., Southey, K., Brömdal, A., Crowley-Cyr, L., Eacersall, D., Farmer, W., Gehrmann, R., Machin, T., & Pillay, Y. (2022). The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes. Research Ethics, 174701612211472. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221147202

Carpentier, R., & McGillivray, B. (2019). Protecting Participants in Clinical Trials Through Research Ethics Review. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_3-1

Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (2019). Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Kodex (p. 31). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/rechtliche_rahmenbedingungen/gute_wissenschaftliche_praxis/kodex_gwp.pdf

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (Ed.). (2013). Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. In Sicherung Guter Wissenschaftlicher Praxis (2. ergänzte Auflage, pp. 1–109). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679188.oth1

Dingwall, R., Iphofen, R., Lewis, J., Oates, J., & Emmerich, N. (2017). Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences. In R. I. FAcSS (Ed.), Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity (Vol. 1, pp. 111–123). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001010

Dove, E. S., & Garattini, C. (2018). Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition. Research Ethics, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117711972

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

Filipovic´, A., Klaus, E., & Strippel, C. (2016). Der Ethik-Kodex der DGPuK. Erläuterungen aus Anlass des Beitrags von Rudolf Stöber in M&K 4/2015. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-1-93

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802170288

Harris, J., & Porcellato, L. (2018). Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618766953

Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510

Hunter, D. (2007). The Roles of Research Ethics Committees: Implications for Membership. Research Ethics, 3(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610700300110

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Jennings, S. (2012). Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics, 8(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445423

Kiegelmann, M. (2020). Forschungsethik. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 227–246). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26887-9_28

Koepsell, D., Brinkman, W. P., & Pont, S. (2014). Human research ethics committees in technical universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540596

Kritikos, M. (2019). Research Ethics Governance. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_1-1

MacNeill, K., Bolt, B., Barrett, E., McPherson, M., Sierra, M., Miller, S., Ednie-Brown, P., & Wilson, C. (2021). An ethical engagement: creative practice research, the academy and professional codes of conduct. Research Ethics, 17(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120915950

Machin, H. E., & Shardlow, S. M. (2017). Overcoming ethical barriers to research. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739938

Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2009). Ethics Review in a Developing Country: A Survey of South African Social Scientists’ Experiences. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.69

McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A Delicate Balancing Act: Negotiating with Gatekeepers for Ethical Research When Researching Minority Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102

McKee, H., & Porter, J. E. (2008). The Ethics of Digital Writing Research: A Rhetorical Approach. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 711–749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457031

Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical Matrix Manual. LEI. https://edepot.wur.nl/216589

Mooney-Somers, J., & Olsen, A. (2017). Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677636

Morris, M. C., & Morris, J. Z. (2016). The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Research Ethics, 12(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023

Msoroka, M. S., & Amundsen, D. (2018). One size fits not quite all: Universal research ethics with diversity. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739939

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Perrault, E. K., & McCullock, S. P. (2019). Concise Consent Forms Appreciated—Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853453

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (Ed.). (2017). Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.1

Raykov, M. (2020). Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119893461

Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A. C., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ, 7(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2

Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404

Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177

Roth, W.-M. (2018). A Transactional Approach to Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3061

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2016-4-483

Silverman, H., Strosberg, M., Luna, F., Philpott, S., & Hemmerle, C. A. (2013). An analysis of online courses in research ethics in the Fogarty-sponsored bioethics training programs. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 8(5), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.59

Spellecy, R., Eve, A. M., Connors, E. R., Shaker, R., & Clark, D. C. (2018). The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618780803

Tully, M., Vail, A., Roberts, S., Brabin, L., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 3.: Sampling and Data Analysis. Research Ethics, 5(3), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500313

Vail, A., Tully, M., Brabin, L., Roberts, S., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 2.: Are the Study Aims Justified and is the Design Appropriate? Research Ethics, 5(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500212

Van den Scott, L.-J. K. (2020). Sociology and Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_68-1

Vitak, J., Proferes, N., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2017). Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617725200

Von Unger, H. (2018). Forschungsethik, digitale Archivierung und biographische Interviews. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 681–693). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18171-0_57

Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719

Wagner, G. G. (2017). Anmerkungen zu den vielfältigen Dimensionen einer Forschungsethik in den Sozial-, Verhaltens- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 265). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.10

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Yalcintas, A., & Selcuk, I. S. (2016). Research Ethics Education in Economics. Review of Social Economy, 74(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2015.1100847

Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2018). Framing “Deception” and “Covertness” in Research: Do Milgram, Humphreys, and Zimbardo Justify Regulating Social Science Research Ethics? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3102

Ethikpruefung

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende