Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Biomedizin

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/filmuniversitaet/detail.action?docID=5763592

Borrett, D. S., Sampson, H., & Cavoukian, A. (2017). Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal. Research Ethics, 13(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116673135

Boyd, K. M. (2017). Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 55–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001006

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

De Oliveira, L. L. H., Vissoci, J. R. N., Machado, W. de L., Rodrigues, C. G., & Limkakeng, A. T. (2017). Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617737163

Emmerich, N. (2017). Remaking Research Ethics in the Social Sciences: Anthropological Reflections on a Collaborative Process. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 125–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001011

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2011). European textbook on ethics in research. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/12567a07-6beb-4998-95cd-8bca103fcf43/language-en

Eyal, N. (2014). Using informed consent to save trust. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(7), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100490

Ferretti, A., Ienca, M., Rivas Velarde, M., Hurst, S., & Vayena, E. (2021). The Challenges of Big Data for Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Swiss Study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethic, 1–15, 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211053538

Fuchs, M., Heinemann, T., Heinrichs, B., Hübner, D., Kipper, J., Rottländer, K., Runkel, T., Spranger, T. M., Vermeulen, V., & Völker-Albert, M. (2010). Forschungsethik: eine Einführung. Verlag J. B. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476022493#aboutAuthors

Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Jackson, J. L., & Larson, E. (2016). Prevalence and commonalities of informed consent templates for biomedical research. Research Ethics, 12(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649995

Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., & Melham, K. (2015). Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.71

Nelson, L. R., Stupiansky, N. W., & Ott, M. A. (2016). The Influence of Age, Health Literacy, and Affluence on Adolescents’ Capacity to Consent to Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616636232

Prictor, M., Lewis, M. A., Newson, A. J., Haas, M., Baba, S., Kim, H., Kokado, M., Minari, J., Molnár-Gábor, F., Yamamoto, B., Kaye, J., & Teare, H. J. A. (2019). Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619887073

Resnik, D. B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.

Roache, R. (2014). Why is informed consent important? J Med Ethics, 40(7), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102264

Roth, W.-M. (2018). A Transactional Approach to Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3061

Sleat, M. (2017). Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 37–46). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001004

Sutrop, M., & Louk, K. (2020). Informed Consent and Ethical Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_8-1

Tolich, M., Tumilty, E., Choe, L., Hohmann-Marriott, B., & Fahey, N. (2019). Researcher Emotional Safety as Ethics in Practice. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_26-1

Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2019). Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 424–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619862395

Wassenaar, D., & Mamotte, N. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsey, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268–282). Oxford University Press.

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731